|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Redundancy: The Purpose of the Protective Award The closure of the Employer’s factory resulted in excess of 100 Employees being made redundant. There was a recognition agreement with the trade union, however the factory closed less than four months after the Employer first indicated the possible closure of its factory. The union sought a protective award for the Employees, under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.189(2) for a breach of the Employer’s obligation under s.188 of the Act to consult before making redundancies. The Court of Appeal expressed that the purpose of a protective award was to ensure meaningful consultation occurred between the Employer and the Employees, by providing a sanction for a breach of the Employer’s obligation to consult and not to compensate the individual employee for any loss suffered. Since there was no meaningful consultation with the trade union, a protective award for the maximum period of 90 days was to be awarded to each Employee. The Court of Appeal felt that in a case where there was no consultation the employment tribunal was entitled to start with the maximum protected period and see if there were any circumstances justifying a reduction. Practical Tips
|
|||||||||||||||||